Evaluation of alternative construction methods for architectural additive manufacturing applications

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorErik, Adem
dc.contributor.authorPak, Elmas
dc.contributor.authorOrhon, Ahmet Vefa
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-17T12:22:56Z
dc.date.available2025-03-17T12:22:56Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentTarsus Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe development of various construction robots has transformed the architectural landscape, facilitating the design and construction of more unique structures through the implementation of diverse designs. This study explores 13 architectural building applications constructed using the additive construction method, comparing them with traditional construction methods as alternatives. Initial steps involved establishing critical criteria for the construction process through extensive literature review and expert consultations. The significance of these criteria was determined using fuzzy Shannon’s Entropy Based on Alpha Level, identifying considerations paramount during the construction phase. Subsequently, the importance degrees of these criteria were instrumental in evaluating potential construction methods for each architectural application using the Fuzzy TOPSIS method, renowned for its efficacy. Findings prioritize building size, construction time, and cost for the architectural applications under review. The comparative analysis revealed that 6 out of the 13 applications constructed with the additive method would benefit more from alternative methods, with the Wood Skeleton method emerging as the superior alternative, closely followed by Concrete Pouring with Mold. Incorporating Fuzzy Shannon’s Entropy and the Fuzzy TOPSIS method, it offers a more nuanced and comprehensive assessment of various construction techniques. Furthermore, the study’s focus on key criteria such as building size, construction time, and cost aligns closely with the industry’s evolving priorities, emphasizing efficiency and sustainability. The findings underscore the need for a more adaptive and selective application of construction technologies and setting a new benchmark for future studies in construction method optimization that blend traditional techniques with cutting-edge decision-making tools. © 2024, Istanbul Teknik Universitesi, Faculty of Architecture. All rights reserved.
dc.description.sponsorshipTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, TÜBİTAK
dc.description.sponsorshipScience Dissemination Foundation, (1649B031905573)
dc.identifier.doi10.58278/0.2024.50
dc.identifier.endpage390
dc.identifier.issn2564-7474
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85201276211
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage375
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.58278/0.2024.50
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13099/1492
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIstanbul Teknik Universitesi, Faculty of Architecture
dc.relation.ispartofA/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20250316
dc.subjectAdditive manufacturing
dc.subjectFuzzy Shannon’s entropy based alpha level
dc.subjectFuzzy TOPSIS
dc.subjectRobotic architecture
dc.subjectTraditional construction methods
dc.titleEvaluation of alternative construction methods for architectural additive manufacturing applications
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu